Sour Grapes Post Election 2012

Monday, May 2, 2011

Quit Killing.... VERBALLY ---- My MOCKINGBIRD Obama

My grandson of 16 must have required reading.... and he left his paperback copy of  To Kill A Mockingbird (released back in 1960.... in my jeep last week.  I opened it to the middle and Scout's voice pulled me into reading it to the end.  Because it is narrated by young Scout, we are able to grow up and come to an understanding about the world in the same way that she does, creating order from the chaos of her everyday life.

A weekend trip to Texas.... prior week....

they was 'killin my Obama with BIRTHER words over his live certificate..... hmmmp!   So he produced it.  My inner anger boild such that if I get on the elevator or step a curb.... my nature is excuse me... hello.  And do you know half of the Oklahoma peck-a-woods won't say a word..... at all!!!   Well excuse the hell out of me.   Jesus keep me near the cross.

Ok cool it Bev... let that antidepressant work.   So I keep going.   And this book has helped me... so, so relevant for today.  UNIVERSAL....tale of how understanding can triumph over old and evil mindsets.!!!


To Kill a Mockingbird is a modern-day morality tale of how prejudice must be met, fought and overcome--no matter where it is present or how difficult that task might seem.

WHO IS ATTICUS.....father, a lawyer and widower....He became the voice of moral conscious in the age that the book was written and represented the ideals and hopes of the liberal classes who hoped to see the end of segregation and racism.

The novel has a courageous and powerful political message about the downtrodden lives of African-Americans in 1930s America, and the prejudice and fear they faced every day,   So SAD, but so TRUE is the plot involving a black man named Tom Robinson, who is accused of raping a white woman. Atticus takes on the case, despite the vitriol this arouses in the largely white, racist townsfolk, because he believes that there has been a serious miscarriage of justice. Given the cold-shoulder by their white neighbors, the Finches are welcomed into the black community, and Scout is amazed by the feeling of cohesion and happiness that this poor, oppressed people are able to muster. When the time of the trial comes round, Atticus proves that the girl that Tom Robinson is accused of raping actually seduced him, and that the injuries to her face were caused by her father, angry that she tried to sleep with a black man.


For a minute....due to a good read...there was suspense and evidence provided at the trial??? But the all white jury convicted Robinson; and he is later killed whilst trying to escape from jail. 

Meanwhile, the girl's father, who held a grudge against Atticus because of some of the things he said in court, waylays Scout and Jem as they walk home one night. It is clear that he wants to them harm, but they are saved by the mysterious Boo, who disarms their attacker and kills him dead.

Scout finally comes face to face with the enigmatic figure of which she was so scared, and realizes that he is just a kindly man, who has been kept away from the world because of a mental retardation that makes him appear simple. The lesson that Scout learns from both Tom Robinson's fate and her new found friend, is the importance of seeing people how they are, and not being blinded by the fears and misunderstandings of prejudice.
To Kill a Mockingbird is a novel by Harper Lee. The book depicts the experiences of a young girl, Scout, and her family in a Southern town. This controversial work deals with aspects of racism, and involves other aspects of violence and alienation,


  • "The one place where a man ought to get a square deal is in a courtroom, be he any color of the rainbow, but people have a way of carrying their resentments right into a jury box. As you grow older, you'll see white men cheat black men every day of your life, but let me tell you something and don't you forget it - whenever a white man does that to a black man, no matter who he is, how rich he is, or how fine a family he comes from, that white man is trash."
    - Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird
    • "Why reasonable people go stark raving mad when anything involving a Negro comes up, is something I don't pretend to understand."
      - Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird
  • Wednesday, April 27, 2011

    Thursday, April 14, 2011

    I'm Praying with Nikol Zachery Bailey & Prophet..... Wonderful!

    Trying Times for my daughter Heidi !!!


    And I hear THEY been messin with my new son!

    Lord, reverse the ruling... no way OUT of Flight School.... where is the Better Blessing?    I know it's just around the corner...

    I feel like RED Neck OK is always after my people....

    BUT MY BROTHER WILL SURVIVE !!!
    An Oklahoma City criminal defense attorney was convicted Wednesday of intentionally letting a witness lie during a 2008 drug trafficking trial.

    An Oklahoma County jury found Mark Anthony Clayborne, 48, guilty of perjury by subornation and preparing a false exhibit.
    Jurors chose a punishment of four years in prison on one count and two years in prison and a $1,000 fine on the other. Formal sentencing was set for June.
    Clayborne represented Jose Cruz Herrera at a jury trial in February 2008. Herrera was convicted at the trial of drug trafficking, conspiracy and cocaine possession. He is serving 102 years in prison.
    Prosecutors alleged Clayborne had a witness lie in a failed effort to give Herrera an alibi for the day of a 2007 drug deal. The witness testified at the drug trial that she was with Herrera in Mexico on that day and had videotaped him there.
    Prosecutors said Clayborne had her testify even though she told him “straight to his face” beforehand that she did not shoot the video and was afraid she would get into trouble if she testified she had done so.
    The videotape actually was shot in 2005 but it had been altered to reflect a date in 2007.
    Prosecutors alleged Clayborne put into evidence a shortened version of the altered videotape, knowing the date on it was false.
    Clayborne's attorneys contended he did not know the videotape had been altered and did not know the witness was lying.


    Read more: http://newsok.com/okc-attorney-convicted-of-suborning-perjury-during-08-drug-trial/article/3558220#ixzz1JW3GDnAn

    Wednesday, April 13, 2011

    Wednesday, March 9, 2011

    Tuesday, February 8, 2011

    I love this Man..... Dred Scott

    Dred Scott 
     (1799 – September 17, 1858), was an African-American slave in the United States who sued unsuccessfully for his freedom in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857. His case was based on the fact that although he and his wife Harriet Scott were slaves, he had lived with his master Dr. John Emerson in states and territories where slavery was illegal according to both state laws and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, including Illinois and Minnesota (which was then part of the Wisconsin Territory). The United States Supreme Court ruled seven to two against Scott, finding that neither he, nor any person of African ancestry, could claim citizenship in the United States, and therefore Scott could not bring suit in federal court under diversity of citizenship rules. Moreover, Scott's temporary residence outside Missouri did not bring about his emancipation under the Missouri Compromise, since that would improperly deprive Scott's owner of his legal property.


    The case raised the issue of a slave who had lived in a free state. Congress had not asserted whether slaves were free if they set foot upon free soil. The ruling overturned the Missouri Compromise since by the court's logic, any attempt at regulating slavery in the federal Territories deprived a slave owner of his property without due process. This enraged the abolitionist Republicans and further exacerbated sectional sentiments that led to the Civil War.
    Scott had traveled with his master Dr. John Emerson, who was in the US Army and often transferred. Scott's extended stay with his master in Illinois, a free state, gave him the legal standing to make a claim for freedom, as did his extended stay at Fort Snelling in the Wisconsin Territory (now Minnesota), where slavery was also prohibited. But Scott did not file a petition for freedom while living in the free lands—perhaps because he was unaware of his rights at the time, or because he was fearful of possible repercussions. After two years, the army transferred Emerson to territory where slavery was legal: first to St. Louis, Missouri, then to Louisiana. In just over a year, the recently married Emerson summoned his slave couple. Instead of staying in the free territory of Wisconsin (now Minnesota), or going to the free state of Illinois, the two traveled nearly 1,250 miles (2000 km)[citation needed], apparently unaccompanied, down the Mississippi River to meet their master. Only after Emerson's death in 1843, when Emerson's widow hired out Scott to an army captain, did Scott seek freedom for himself and his wife. First he offered to buy his freedom from Emerson's widow, Irene Emerson—then living in St. Louis—for US $300, about $7,000 in current value. After she refused his request, Scott sought freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court.

    Dred Scott Case

    Decision of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott Case


    The Ordinance of 1787 and the Missouri Compromise Declared Unconstitutional

    Washington, Friday, March 6 - The opinion of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott Case was delivered by Chief Justice Taney. It was a full and elaborate statement of the views of the Court. They have decided the following important points:

    First - Negroes, whether slaves or free, that is, men of the African race, are not citizens of the United States by the Constitution.
    Second - The Ordinance of 1787 had no independent constitutional force or legal effect subsequently to the adoption of the Constitution, and could not operate of itself to confer freedom or citizenship within the Northwest Territory on negroes not citizens by the Constitution.
    Third - The provisions of the Act of 1820, commonly called the Missouri Compromise, in so far as it undertook to exclude negro slavery from, and communicate freedom and citizenship to, negroes in the northern part of the Louisiana cession, was a Legislative act exceeding the powers of Congress, and void, and of no legal effect to that end.

    In deciding these main points, the Supreme Court determined the following incidental points:
    First - The expression "territory and other property" of the Union, in the Constitution, applies "in terms" only to such territory as the Union possessed at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.
    Second - The rights of citizens of the United States emigrating into any Federal territory, and the power of the Federal Government there depend on the general provisions of the Constitution, which defines in this, as in all other respects, the powers of Congress.
    Third - As Congress does not possess power itself to make onsetments relative to the persons or property of citizens of the United States, in a Federal Territory, other than such as the Constitution confers, so it cannot constitutionally delegate any such powers to a Territorial Government, organized by it under the Constitution.
    Fourth - The legal condition of a slave in the State of Missouri is not affected by the temporary sojourn of such slave in any other Sate, but on his return his condition still depends on the laws of Missouri.

    As the plaintiff was not a citizen of Missouri, he, therefore, could not sue in the Courts of the United States. The suit must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

    The delivery of this opinion occupied about three hours, and was listened to with profound attention by a crowded Court room. Among the auditors were gentlemen of eminent legal ability, and a due proportion of ladies.

    Judge Nelson stated the merits of the case. The question was whether or not the removal of Scott from Missouri with his master to Illinois, with a view to temporary residence there, worked his emancipation. He maintained that the question depended wholly on the law of Missouri, and for that reason the judgment of the Court below should be affirmed.

    Judge Catron believed the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to decide the merits of the case. He argued that Congress could not do directly what it could not do indirectly. If it could exclude one species of property, it could exclude another. With regard to the Territories ceded, Congress could govern them; and the Missouri act of 1820 violated the leading features of the Constitution, and was therefore void. He concurred with his brother Judges, that Scott is a slave, and was so when this suit was brought.
    Several other Judges are to deliver their views tomorrow

    We's Free... I declare We is Free!!

    1-1-1863
    A Proclamation by the President of the United States


    That on the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all person held as slaves within any State, or any designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States shall be then, thenceforward, and forever, free;

    In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand, and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.
    Done at the City of Washington, this Twenty-second day of September, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-two, and of the Independence of the United States the eighty-seventh.

    Abraham Lincoln.
    By the President.
    William H. Seward, Secretary of State.The War Still to be Prosecuted for the Restoration of the Union


    A Decree of Emancipation
    All Slaves in States in Rebellion on the First of January Next to be Free
    The Gradual Abolition and Colonization Schemes Adhered to
    Loyal Citizens to be Remunerated for Losses, Including Slaves

    Monday, January 31, 2011

    Last Day of the Month

    Snnow's a comin

    Friday, January 28, 2011

    Nelson Mandella

    Date of birth: July 18, 1918.   Profession: Peace activist, Law clerk, Security… Works written: Mandela, apartheid,  Awards won: Order of the Nile, Nobel Peace Prize,…Political party: African National Congress

    25 years ago: The Challenger Explosion

    Cape Canaveral, FL:    I was 32 years old:   I saw our first high-tech catastrophe to unfold on live TV.  Schoolchildren everywhere tuned in that morning to watch the launch of the first schoolteacher and ordinary citizen bound for space, Christa McAuliffe.   She never made it.  McAuliffe and six others on board perished as the cameras rolled, victims of stiff O-ring seals and feeble bureaucratic decisions.

    It was, as one grief and trauma expert recalls, "the beginning of the age when the whole world knew what happened as it happened." 

    I clipped the newspaper article.... so struck by tragedy:  I don't know if the paper if cracked, folder away in a paper box.

    Wednesday, January 26, 2011

    22nd North Arkansas Ancestor Fair, June 3, 2011 - June 4, 2011

    22nd North Arkansas Ancestor Fair, June 3, 2011 - June 4, 2011
    CONTACT:
    Searcy County Historical Society
    2333 N. East Oaks Drive
    Fayetteville, AR 72703
    Ph: (479) 442-3691
    http://www.ancestorfair.us/
    shirleysdream@windstream.net

    22nd North Arkansas Ancestor Fair
    Civil War Sesquicentennial
    Marshall, Arkansas - June 3-4, 2011
    Friday, June 3, 2011
    SESSION I: Genealogical Help. VFW Museum, Marshall - $7.50
     
    9:30 a.m. - 10:30 a. m.: Finding Confederate AncestorsRussell P. Baker, Arkansas History Commission, Retired

    11:00 a.m - 12:00 noon: Finding Union Ancestors
    Russell P. Baker, Arkansas History Commission, Retired
    (DNA surprise for some Searcy/Newton County families)

    12:00 - 1 p.m.: Lunch break

    SESSION II:
    Background for Civil War North Arkansas. VFW Museum, Marshall - $7.50
    1:00 - 2:00 p. m.: Searcy County & North Arkansas January to October 1861: Recruiting for Dixie
    James Johnston

    2:30 - 3:30 p.m.: North Arkansas Peace Society and the Chain Gang: November 1861 to April 1862
    James Johnston

    There will be no cost for the 3:30 to 5:00 p.m. session
    Chain Gang Seminar: Telling Your Chain Gang Stories

    MIXER DINNER:
    Cost and site to be announced

    Saturday, June 4, 2011
    ANCESTOR FAIR: Civic Center, Zack Road, Marshall
    8:00 - 9:00 a.m.: Providers set up
    9:00 a. m. - 3:00 p.m.: ANCESTOR FAIR (Free)
    Doors open for Genealogy Swap Meet
    No pre-registration required, sign in for your table when you set
    up

    April 30, 2011 EVENT Civil War, 2011-2015.

    Old State House Museum
    300 W. Markham
    Little Rock, AR 72201
    Ph: (501) 324-9685
    http://www.oldstatehouse.com/
    info@oldstatehouse.org

    Join us at the Old State House Museum on Saturday, April 30, 2011 as Arkansas commemorates the kick-off celebration for the Sesquicentennial of the American Civil War.
    Visitors to the museum will see a special screening of the new AETN documentary about the Civil War; special documents on exhibit from the Arkansas History Commission, such as the 1861 Arkansas Constitution and the original secession document; and the first of five exhibits put on by the Old State House Museum about the Civil War, titled An Enduring Union.
    Living historians will be present throughout the day! Visitors to this special event will see a reenactment of the May 6, 1861 final vote on secession, flag presentations by two local companies, and state and militia troops camped out on the lawn. Hands-on activities will be available.
    Activities will take place from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Admission is free!

    April 23, 2011 EVENT Civil War, 2011-2015.

    http://www.arkansascivilwar150.com/events/

    The Arkansas Civil War Sesquicentennial Commission will sanction suitable events and activities throughout Arkansas during the commemoration of the 150th anniversary of the Civil War, 2011-2015.


    Sesquicentennial at Fort Smith, April 23, 2011
    CONTACT:
    Fort Smith National Historic Site
    301 Parker Avenue
    Fort Smith, AR 72902
    Ph: (479) 783-3961
    http://www.nps.gov/fosm/index.htm

    Kicking off the sesquicentennial at Fort Smith National Historic Site will be an event on April 23, 2011, dedicated to the day the fort fell under Arkansas state occupation. This event falls on the day that Company D and E of the First Cavalry under Union Captain Samuel Sturgis was led to safety by Delaware Indian scout Black Beaver after they abandoned Fort Smith in 1861. On the same day, Arkansas State Troops took control of an unoccupied fort.

    Thursday, January 20, 2011

    150th Year Anniversary of 4-yr American Civil War

    The new word of the day:   sesquicentennial anniversary!   Celebrations are being planned around the nation to commemorate the anniversary .. a great time to learn more about that time period! 


    May I introduce myself and my audience to the book entitled “Everyday Life During the Civil War, A Guide for Writers, Students, and Historians” by Michael J. Varhola,  ISBN #1582973377.  Click her for book preview  peek inside this book on a website.